Administration's 9/11 evidence is lacking

Editor,

After re-reading "The New Pearl Harbor" by David Ray Griffin, one can only come to the inescapable conclusion that 9/11 was allowed to happen. The facts presented are more than any thinking person could deny. I know of course that there will always be those with their heads buried in the sand so far that they would deny the Second Coming if they were hit in the head with the fact of it … that is, if they could be hit in the head with anything in such a state of being.

But all that aside, the book brings back a treasure trove of facts that have been swept under the rug and forgotten, suggesting even the complicity of the Bush Administration. That high level government officials knew about the attack in advance can hardly be dismissed as being a crazy unfounded theory.

There is plenty of evidence to suggest that the government account of what happened is patently false. The Bush Administration has not provided one shred of credible evidence to substantiate its claim that 9/11 was an Islamic terrorist attack on this country.

Not only that, but it has obstructed and stonewalled every attempt to investigate just what did happen. What is it this administration does not want us to know? The answer would seem to be … the truth.

For all the questions presented in this book, not one has been asked by the media or presented for public consideration. That would seem to suggest that the so called news media is nothing but a rehash of parroted propaganda … the food of substance for Hitler's Third Reich.

Don Basta

Polson